The Ecological Bankruptcy of Christianity? (7)

Submitted by Joe on May 3, 2006 - 9:28am.
*Today is the final episode in my essay on the question of the ecological bankruptcy of Christianity for Advanced Workshop.

Today covers the conclusion of the essay and the full bibliography, for those who are interested in some further reading on the issues raised.

Given that this is the end of this essay, it'd be good to have comments and conversation on the Christianity and ecology forum.

Conclusion

The Twentieth Century saw a gathering concern over the environmental impact of human activity. Whilst there was prior reflection by theologians such as Sittler, Lynn White Jr.'s allegation of Christian ecological bankruptcy in his famous 1967 essay lay down a profound challenge to the Christian tradition. White's accusation has prompted further analysis of Christian culpability, which has variously anchored the guilt in the Renaissance, in ancient Near East patriarchy, and in the symbiosis of Platonism with Judeo-Hebraic monotheism. Wherever blame lies specifically, it is clear that Western Christianity must carry a large amount of it.

Responses to the allegation fall into three broad types. Apologetic responses thoughtfully seek to affirm the positive ecological legacy of the Christian tradition. However, frequent emphasis on stewardship and human uniqueness reinforces the Christian anthropocentric tendency, and provides a weak set of tools for responding to the ecological crisis itself. At the more extreme end, apologetic responses can view ecology as actually anti-Christian. Reconstructionist responses uphold the accusation, and rightly seek to dissolve the dualisms that alienate God, humanity and nature, and affirm the embodied human location in nature. However, this is typically achieved by collapsing divine transcendence into divine immanence such that God becomes practically indistinguishable from nature. Whilst this may enable us to respond adequately to the ecological predicament, it might be asked to what extent such heterodox reconstructions are still Christian responses. Possibly the most promising responses are from revisionist perspectives. These accept the allegation of culpability, but apply it critically to the actual manifestations of the Christian tradition. Similarly the insights of reconstructive approaches are welcomed, but with critical evaluation. Consequently, there is recognition of the ambiguous ecological promise of the Christian tradition, and revisionist responses seek to re-engage theology with focus on the ecological motifs in both the Scriptures and the tradition. Ecological promise lies in understanding and responding to God in the world and the world in God.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Berry, R. J. ed. The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

Bouma-Prediger, Steven. The Greening Of Theology: The Ecological Models Of Rosemary Radford Ruether, Joseph Sittler, And Jürgen Moltmann. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press, 1995.

Evangelical Environmental Network. 'An Evangelical Declaration on the Care of Creation.' Pages 17-22 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

Fox, Matthew. Original Blessing: A Primer in Creation Spirituality: Presented in Four Paths, Twenty-Six Themes, and Two Questions. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 2000.

Hallman, David G. 'Climate Change: Ethics, Justice, and Sustainable Community.' Pages 453-71 in Christianity and Ecology: Seeking The Well-Being Of Earth And Humans. Edited by Dieter T. Hessel and Rosemary Radford Ruether. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions, 2000.

Hessel, Dieter T. and Rosemary Radford Ruether, eds. Christianity and Ecology: Seeking The Well-Being Of Earth And Humans. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions, 2000.

Maguire, Daniel C. 'Population, Consumption, Ecology: The Triple Problematic.' Pages 403-27 in Christianity and Ecology: Seeking The Well-Being Of Earth And Humans. Edited by Dieter T. Hessel and Rosemary Radford Ruether. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions, 2000.

McFague, Sallie. 'An Ecological Christology: Does Christianity Have It?' Pages 29-45 in Christianity and Ecology: Seeking The Well-Being Of Earth And Humans. Edited by Dieter T. Hessel and Rosemary Radford Ruether. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions, 2000.

McGrath, Alister E. 'The Stewardship of the Creation: An Evangelical Affirmation.' Pages 86-89 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

Moltmann, Jürgen. God and Creation: An Ecological Doctrine of Creation. The Gifford Lectures, 1984-1985. London: SCM, 1985.

------ 'God's Covenant and Our Responsibility.' Pages 107-13 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

Northcott, Michael S. The Environment and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Osborn, Lawrence. Guardians of Creation: Nature in Theology and the Christian Life. Leicester: Apollos, 1993.

Ruether, Rosemary Radford. 'Conclusion: Eco-Justice at the Center of the Church's Mission.' Pages 603-14 in Christianity and Ecology: Seeking The Well-Being Of Earth And Humans. Edited by Dieter T. Hessel and Rosemary Radford Ruether. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions, 2000.

------ 'Ecofeminism: The Challenge to Theology.' Pages 97-112 in Christianity and Ecology: Seeking The Well-Being Of Earth And Humans. Edited by Dieter T. Hessel and Rosemary Radford Ruether. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions, 2000.

Santmire, H. Paul. Nature Reborn: The Ecological and Cosmic Promise of Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000.

------ The Travail of Nature: The Ambiguous Ecological Promise of Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1985.

Sider, Ronald J. 'Biblical Foundations for Creation Care.' Pages 43-49 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

White, Lynn Jr. 'The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis.' Pages 31-42 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000. Repr., with anglicisations, from Science 155 (1967): 1203-07.

Wilkinson, Loren. 'The Making of the Declaration.' Pages 50-59 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

Wright, Richard T. 'The Declaration Under Siege.' Pages 74-79 in The Care of Creation: Focusing Concern and Action. Edited by R. J. Berry. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

For those just joining in at this point, you might like to read the rest of the essay by browsing through the list below.

You may be interested to know that the word limit for the essay was 3,000 words ±10%. My essay came in at 3,299 words - 1 word under the 3,000 +10% limit! I seem to have a habit of doing that. 3000 words is a very tough limit within which to communicate the depth and breadth on such big subjects.

Joe's blog | email this page
by peaceworrier
May 3, 2006 - 2:32pm

just adding a 'non' Christian ecofeminist analysis of the role of Christianity in mindset and science on some important momenta ... disturbing reading not for the feint hearted but in my view 'essential'? ...

The Death of Nature
by Carolyn Merchant
Publisher HARPERCOLLINS ©1990
ISBN 0062505955 (EAN 9780062505958

also synopsised in 'Earthcare' edited by C. Merchant

GOD BLESS!

Peace and Love,

by Joe
May 4, 2006 - 9:52am

Thanks for that pointer, Eva. Looks like an interesting book.

by Sander Chan (not verified)
May 8, 2006 - 11:40am

I really enjoyed reading your essay. I think you made very clear overview responses to White's thesis. I couldn't have done it better. I haven't read Santmire, but I think that it's an interesting typology. I would rename the third "revisionist" category, since it is a rather loaded term to apply to a German victim of World War 2. (Revisionism is also a pseudo-historic strand of sympathizers of national-socialism who deny the holocaust.)

I am an ardent supporter of taking the created order (of which we are part) more serious in our churches. I think we really miss the point if we only concentrate on "saving souls" (which we never do, but it is the Holy Spirit who convinces), and disregard our God-given position as care takers of the earth. Furthermore, some strands of Christianity (and especially some protestant denominations) miss out on the opportunity to care for some of the greatest problems of our time (e.g. climate change, desertification, food insecurity etc.). This might result (and I think has already resulted) in a serious marginalization of Christian worship beyond the Church. Christianity is no longer considered as a relevant religion in face of today's problems. And when churches fail to act in response of problems of global environmental change, they (unwillingly) confirm the idea that the church is irrelevant.

I don't think Christianity is bankrupt in an ecological sense. But Christian culture, like any human culture, is susceptible to very damaging ideas, traditions and technologies. The Bible does not offer a blueprint for church, government or international ecological policy, but it does offer insight on the environment as a valuable and neccessary part of the created order. I believe that Christ's love proves quite the opposite of ecological bankruptcy.

I would like to make Christians more attentive to issues of global environmental change, also from a biblical and Christian cultural/traditional perspective. And I think essays and sermons on this topic will to raise awareness. I want to develop an instruction on Christianity and the environment (a sermon and some readings). Your clarity on the issue, also for people who are not working in the field of the environment, is very inspiring to me. Thank you very much.

If you don't mind I would like to link you essay to my blog.

by Joe
May 8, 2006 - 1:26pm

Sander, thank you for your thoughtful response. I hadn't thought of the consequences of the term 'revisionism' with regard to Moltmann, so thanks for pointing that out. It is Santmire's term, but you're right to point out the difficulties with it.

If Moltmann is right, I should say that your ardour for taking creation seriously in the Church could be argued even more strongly. Moltmann's trinitarian understanding would encourage us to perceive God in creation and creation in God, and demand that we place the cosmos at the heart of the life of the Church.

Like you, I'd argue with the 'revisionists' that it is more a cultural aspect of certain incarnations of Christianity that is at fault, rather than a more fundamental culpability with Christianity - as I see it, the issue is more endemic than pandemic.

Please feel free to link to the essay on your blog. It hasn't been marked yet, so do bear that in mind. And do come back to the site to carry on the conversation.

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote> <br> <div> <span>
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <fn>...</fn> to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
More information about formatting options